The individuals implicated in the break-in are utilizing Cell-jamming technology in order to circumvent surveillance cameras and avoid being captured on video.
The act of cell-jamming involves the use of devices to obstruct radio or wireless signals
CMPD has reported that burglars have managed to outsmart surveillance cameras during certain instances of home break-ins by utilizing advanced technology.
Cell-jamming, also known as signal interference, occurs when an individual utilizes a device to disrupt radio or wireless transmissions.
As per the Federal Communications Commission, it is against federal law to employ a phone-jammer, GPS blocker, or any other signal jamming device with the intention of intentionally obstructing, jamming, or interfering with authorized radio communications. It is crucial to understand that there are no exemptions for utilizing such devices within a business, classroom, residence, or vehicle.
A device situated roughly 30 feet away from the intended target, or even home cameras, could potentially cause cell-jamming.
A suspect was caught on video sneaking through a yard in a south Charlotte community during the night. Nevertheless, it should be acknowledged that not all instances have been captured on camera.
According to John Shocknesse, VP of Customer Operations for CPI Security, wireless devices are always susceptible to interference, and people will inevitably find ways to disrupt their communication.
It only takes a moment for someone to appear on camera, but with the implementation of cell-jamming, a simple flick of a switch or push of a button can erase any evidence of their presence.
In certain cases of home break-ins in south Charlotte, CMPD has acknowledged the occurrence of this problem.
According to Shocknesse, there has been no indication of the mentioned activity. They are well-informed about this situation and are diligently working towards obtaining the best and most advanced technology, which they consider to be of paramount importance.
WBTV inquired about the types of devices that are particularly susceptible to cell-jamming
According to Shocknesse, the absence of encryption becomes apparent in wireless devices that are considerably older.
He mentioned that the newer security and surveillance systems have been upgraded with superior technology, including encryption, thereby ensuring heightened levels of security.
According to Shocknesse, the importance of having cameras and onboard recording cannot be overstated. The cameras are fitted with memory devices, which means that if there are any issues, the footage of the incident is still being recorded and can be provided to the police department.
Furthermore, he emphasized that the optimal approach to thwart cell-jamming is to employ state-of-the-art technology with encryption and to select a wired device over Wi-Fi, in addition to his earlier advice.
In order to effectively deter home break-ins, it is recommended to implement straightforward measures such as maintaining adequate lighting, activating alarm systems, and regularly trimming bushes to a height no greater than three feet.
In today’s society, mobile phones have become an indispensable tool for individuals. However, their usage within conference rooms often poses serious challenges, such as interrupting the meeting’s flow and distracting other participants. Hence, the implementation of a mobile phone signal jammer serves as an effective solution to ensure a smooth and uninterrupted meeting.
The implementation of cell phone signal jammers within the conference room proves to be highly effective in obstructing cell phone signals. This, in turn, ensures that mobile phones do not disrupt the smooth flow of meetings. By prohibiting the use of mobile phones, participants are able to fully engage in the meeting without any distractions. Moreover, this measure also serves as a protective measure, safeguarding the personal privacy of attendees and preventing any unauthorized access to sensitive meeting information.
Moreover, the mobile phone jammer exhibits a remarkable ability to shield signals and provide extensive coverage. Its range extends to cover the entirety of the conference room, ensuring that the meeting remains unaffected by external factors. Furthermore, its advanced technology ensures an outstanding signal shielding performance, guaranteeing that mobile phones do not interfere with the proceedings.
Moreover, cell phone gsm jammer boast a user-friendly nature. Their operation is simple and easily understandable, making them accessible to all users regardless of technical knowledge. By effortlessly installing the device in the conference room, it becomes instantly operational. Hence, the presence of specialized technicians is unnecessary for its operation.
The utilization of mobile phone signal jammers within conference rooms is limited to a particular range.
The mobile phone signal jammer, despite its moniker, does not impede the signal as a typical jammer would. Instead, it functions akin to a signal jammer.
The signal tower serves as the intermediary for the transmission between mobile phones, following the path of mobile phone-signal tower-mobile phone. However, when a signal jammer disrupts the connection path between the mobile phone and the signal tower, the transmission is impeded. It is important to note that the signal tower remains unaffected by this interference. As mobile phones are shared within a particular area, it is common to encounter situations where the normal usage of mobile phone signals is hindered, even outside of conference rooms.
It is important to understand that conference room cell phone signal jammers do not offer a complete solution.
Presently, cell phone signal jammers in the market can limit cell phone signals from a distance of 1640ft 5in meters from the transmitting station and a radius greater than 65ft 7in. The shielding radius is adaptable. It only obstructs mobile phone signals and does not influence other electronic devices. Hence, if you are encountering weak mobile phone signal even when you are not near the examination room, do not hold the signal jammer responsible. It might also be a problem with your own mobile phone.
Conference rooms are subject to regulations regarding the frequency bands that can be impacted by mobile phone signal jammers.
Electromagnetic waves cover a broad frequency band, ranging from a few Hz to tens of hundreds of GHz. While every segment can be utilized, certain segments are more frequently used than others.
The GSM receiving frequency band is 885~960MHz;
The receiving frequency band of CDMA is 869-894MHz;
The receiving frequency band of DCS is 1805-1880MHz.
The arrest warrants obtained on Friday disclosed that a local residence was broken into by a group of burglars who have been targeting homes in Connecticut and Massachusetts. The burglars were able to gain access to the residence by obtaining detailed information on the security system from the homeowner’s co-worker.
Charges of conspiracy to commit first-degree burglary and conspiracy to commit second-degree larceny have led to the arrest of Matthew Colon, a 31-year-old individual from West Springfield, Massachusetts. Additionally, Enrique Santiago, a 37-year-old resident of Springfield, Massachusetts, is currently facing charges that encompass first-degree burglary, possession of burglary tools, theft of a firearm, and conspiracy.
As per the warrant for Colon, law enforcement authorities are projecting the arrest of a third suspect in connection with the case. This particular incident is part of a larger pattern of break-ins characterized by the utilization of advanced surveillance methods and access to information regarding homeowners’ absence.
A Green Manor Terrace inhabitant from Long Island called the police on May 20, 2022, after noticing two men walking through his backyard on a security camera. The officers who intervened in the burglary discovered a shattered rear sliding glass door and a trail of abandoned evidence near the house, including a wifi jammer, a two-way portable radio, a glass punch tool, a pry bar, and bolt cutters, according to the warrant.
In the arrest warrant affidavit, Windsor Locks Detective Sgt. Jeff Lampson stated that the burglars successfully cut through a chain link fence and disabled surveillance cameras using a combination of manual techniques and a WiFi jammer. Despite their efforts, one camera positioned by the pool was beyond the range of the jammer device and continued to capture footage. The homeowner reported the loss of US$4,200 in cash, along with men’s watches, jewelry, and his wife’s 9 mm pistol.
As per the police report, on May 26, a pillowcase was found by a resident residing two houses down. Inside the pillowcase, the resident discovered watches, a handgun, and various other belongings that were later identified by the victims as their own. After the burglary, the burglars fled in different directions, evident from the locations of the stolen loot bag and the backpack containing a WiFi jammer.
Lampson reported on Friday that the use or operation of gsm jammer devices is against federal law and the case has caught the attention of federal investigators. Additionally, he noted that the local police have noticed a rise in the use of these devices during residential burglaries.
In this particular scenario, the police were able to establish the culprits’ downfall by utilizing DNA evidence. During a daylight investigation of the Green Manor Terrace area on May 23, a homeowner reported discovering a pair of unfamiliar gloves and promptly handed them over to the authorities. The police subsequently forwarded swabs taken from the gloves, as well as other suspected evidence that the thieves may have handled, to the state forensic laboratory for further examination.
Santiago was implicated in an “offender hit” from DNA on the gloves, as reported by the lab on August 16, according to Lampson’s warrant. The police revealed that the same DNA was associated with two earlier burglary investigations, one of which was a car break-in in Middletown from 2010, and the other was a burglary in South Hadley, Massachusetts in 2012, where firearms were stolen. Santiago was taken into custody in both cases, according to the warrant.
As stated in the warrant, Santiago, represented by his lawyer, disclosed to the Windsor Locks investigators that the burglary at Green Manor Terrace was orchestrated by an individual driving a black sedan, whose father owned a remodeling company. Lampson, in the same warrant, wrote that when he inquired with the homeowner about recognizing someone matching that description, the homeowner immediately pointed out Colon, a colleague at a home health care business in East Longmeadow, Mass.
As per the warrant, the homeowner affirmed that he considered Colon to be a friend and had shared details about his trip to Long Island in May. Additionally, the victim stated that Colon and his father had provided assistance in renovating his house. The warrant further stated that the homeowner mentioned that Matthew Colon had visited his home several times and was well aware of the surveillance camera system.
In light of the victim’s statements and the evidence gathered from the burglary, Colon confessed to the police that he had been coerced into participating in the scheme by the third suspect. The warrant states that the police are likely to apprehend the third suspect soon.
Along with Colon and the victim from Windsor Locks, the suspect’s girlfriend was also a staff member at the home health care business. Lampson’s warrant revealed that several other workers at the company had their homes in Massachusetts broken into. One of them stated that Colon had been to her house to assist with a gazebo repair before the burglary.
As per the warrant, cellphone records revealed that Colon, Santiago, and the unidentified suspect had made calls to each other before and after the Windsor Locks burglary. The authorities have identified the third suspect as a repeat offender with a lengthy criminal record, including armed robbery and numerous burglaries.
Santiago’s extensive criminal record, as mentioned in the warrant, includes convictions for burglary and larceny in Connecticut. The Massachusetts investigators suspect his involvement in a criminal organization that specializes in targeted burglaries. Santiago has posted a bond of US$150,000 and is expected to make an appearance in the state Superior Court in Hartford on May 31. Similarly, Colon has posted a bond of US$100,000 and is scheduled to appear in court on May 2.
ASSERTION: A colossal, glowing skeleton was erected above passersby in an open square near the Burj Khalifa using drones as part of a Halloween exhibit.
The claim that the video is authentic is false. According to experts, there are clear indications that the “drone show” is a fake, such as its speed, which exceeds the current capabilities of drone technology. Furthermore, the audience below the skeleton does not respond to the massive spectacle above them signal jamming.
It has been widely circulated on social media since Halloween that a video showed a nighttime display that almost reached the height of the Burj Khalifa, the world’s tallest building.
Within the brief 8-second video, a formation of illuminated drones creates the appearance of a skeleton. This drone skeleton gracefully moves forward, suspended directly above the pedestrians who are leisurely strolling around an open-air plaza adjacent to Dubai Mall, a renowned shopping destination. Notably, the skeleton’s height almost mirrors the towering skyscraper, measuring an impressive 2,716 feet and 6 inches (828 meters) drone jammer.
One TikTok post that shared the video stated, “Dubai’s #Halloween drone show takes a chilling twist as a haunting skeleton appears in the sky.” As of Friday, the video had garnered around 8.5 million views.
Other individuals added a political twist to the alarming demonstration, such as a message on X, previously known as Twitter, that declares: “During Halloween, the UAE organizes a remarkable drone simulation featuring a colossal skeleton at Burj Khalifa in Dubai. This choice has provoked anger among numerous Muslim nations, who perceive Halloween as a ‘satanic holiday’ coinciding with the tragic occurrences in Gaza.”
However, various specialists have informed The Associated Press that the video does not truly portray a structure constructed from drones.
Preston Ward, the chief pilot and general counsel for Sky Elements Drone Shows in Fort Worth, Texas, confidently stated that the display was completely fabricated. He not only exposed the falsehood on social media but also emphasized its fraudulent nature.
Ward highlighted several indications in the video suggesting that the skeleton is not as it appears. Firstly, it exhibits an excessive speed that surpasses the capabilities of current drone technology. Additionally, the estimated 2,000 drones involved in the display emit an unexpectedly low level of noise. Lastly, there is an improbable flawlessness in the overall presentation.
He expressed, “The appearance seems excessively flawless, as well. There will always be some room for error. In a live performance, there will always be some element of unpredictability. Moreover, all their hues appear identical, and the illuminations possess an identical radiance.”
Furthermore, Ryan Sigmon, co-founder of Firefly Drone Shows in Detroit, concurs that operating drones above pedestrians in a densely populated vicinity, as depicted in the video, poses a significant safety risk. He also acknowledges that the skeleton portrayed in the footage lacks authenticity.
Apart from the technological and logistical considerations, there seems to be a lack of reaction from anyone in the video towards the massive structure hovering above them. It is quite unusual that this is the only video available online from the supposed show, especially considering the prevalence of smartphones in today’s age. Furthermore, there have been no announcements or advertisements regarding any such show taking place in Dubai.
The origin of the video remains unknown, but it was shared on TikTok by Geoscan Group, a drone show production company, on Tuesday and garnered millions of views. Despite being contacted for comment, Geoscan has not responded, and the video has since been removed from their TikTok account as of Friday.
___
As part of its endeavor to combat the dissemination of false information, AP is actively collaborating with external entities to provide accurate context to deceptive content that is being circulated on the internet. To gain further insights into AP’s fact-checking initiatives, please explore additional information on fact-checking at AP.
According to an official statement, a US Reaper drone was downed by Houthi rebels backed by Iran in the vicinity of Yemen.
According to a defense official, Houthi forces have successfully shot down an unmanned US military drone near the Yemeni coast. This incident was reported by CNN.
According to the official, the MQ-9 Reaper drone was operating in international airspace and over international waters at the time it was shot down. The incident is currently being investigated by US Central Command.
The shootdown, for which the Iran-backed Houthi militants assumed responsibility on Wednesday, took place a few weeks after the USS Carney, a US Navy warship, intercepted a series of missiles and drones fired by the Houthis as they were moving northward along the Red Sea. As reported by CNN, the ship successfully neutralized four cruise missiles and 15 drones within a nine-hour timeframe. The clear trajectory of these weapons left little room for speculation regarding their destination, which was evidently Israel.
In the wake of Hamas’ assault on Israel, Iranian proxy factions have intensified their assaults on US forces and properties in the Middle East. Over the past few weeks, there have been approximately 40 attacks on US and coalition bases in Iraq and Syria, resulting in minor injuries including traumatic brain injuries among several US servicemembers, as confirmed by officials.
The attacks on US forces in the region have been attributed to Iran by a senior defense official who referred to the country as “the center of gravity”. The official also stated that the evidence points to Iranian involvement in the attacks.
On October 26, the United States responded to the actions of certain groups by conducting airstrikes in Syria. The airstrikes specifically targeted the infrastructure that was being utilized by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and its associated groups. To carry out these strikes, an F-15 fighter jet and a pair of F-16 fighter jets were deployed, employing precision-guided munitions. The primary objective was to neutralize a weapons and ammunition storage facility located in Abu Kamal, which is situated near the border separating Syria and Iraq.
CNN has informed that Iran is aiming to take advantage of the negative response towards the US backing of Israel. Although Tehran may not be directly instructing the groups’ assaults, it does seem to be promoting them.
After the retaliatory strikes in Syria last month, the US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin delivered a stern caution to Tehran.
The statement released by Austin suggests that Iran may be involved in the recent attacks against our forces. However, we believe in maintaining open channels of communication with all nations and will continue to engage in dialogue with Iran to address any concerns. We remain committed to protecting our forces and will take necessary measures to ensure their safety.
A bombing drone, as its name suggests, is an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) primarily employed for conducting drone strikes. It falls within a broader classification of combat drones that fulfill various roles such as target acquisition, surveillance, reconnaissance, and intelligence gathering.
Bomber drones, despite being unmanned, are not completely automated. Instead, they are typically operated by humans in real-time from a remote location.
It is evident that there is a significant reduction in weight when compared to conventional aircraft, as all the requirements of a human pilot are irrelevant in this case.
The following is a concise overview of stealth bombers and the mechanics behind their disabling process.
The Myth of Detecting Stealth Bomber Drones.
In an ideal world, bomber drones would epitomize the authentic essence of stealth. As one can envision, this entails evading detection from targets entirely. Any potential compromise could result in an unsuccessful culmination of an ongoing mission.
The US Air Force’s RQ-170 serves as a prime illustration of a compromise. In December 2011, an RQ-170 crashed on the border between Iran and Afghanistan. The Iranians quickly seized the wreckage and began reverse engineering their own version of the technology.
The RQ-180 owes its existence not only to the ability to replicate but also to the capability to enhance the original design. These drones are designed to be undetectable spy aircraft, but what does the term “stealth” imply in this context?
The majority of individuals associate drone stealth with its capacity to evade radar detection. While satellites possess extensive visibility, their operational rigidity limits their ability to adapt, thereby playing a role in the incorporation of detection avoidance features in certain designs.
The functioning of radar technology is relatively straightforward. It operates by emitting a signal that reflects off an aircraft, revealing its location and enabling tracking capabilities.
Nevertheless, the challenge intensifies when dealing with drones that possess a compact design, thereby giving rise to the concept of their stealthiness.
The flaw in this myth arises from its failure to take into account the influence of radio frequencies. Without a doubt, attaining autonomous control necessitates a certain degree of communication reliant on frequencies. Nevertheless, it is crucial to recognize that these frequencies can be obstructed through the use of appropriate technology.
However, opting for this approach does entail a higher degree of complexity in contrast to relying on radar recognition for detecting drones.
What are the requirements to deactivate a drone used for bombing purposes?
The equipment available in this location can be categorized into two groups: drone detection and drone disruption. The former is dedicated to identifying drones, while the latter is primarily focused on deactivating the detected drones.
The Best Four Unmanned Aerial System Technologies for Countering Threats.
The use of drones poses a potential threat to both human safety and security. Additionally, they are frequently employed for espionage purposes, gathering sensitive information from secure locations like military installations, and can cause harm by transporting explosives.
The counter-drone technology field has been advancing at a rapid pace, particularly in the military sector. To find out about the top four trending counter UAS technologies, read on.
Meshes
The drone detection solution is frequently employed by militaries to apprehend drones. Once the net intercepts a drone, it halts its movement and forces it to descend to the ground. This effective measure ensures that a drone cannot return to its sender, thereby preventing the leakage of sensitive information from a military station or, worse, averting potential physical harm caused by any explosives it may be carrying.
Advantages of using nets to catch drones include a low risk of harm to the sender or others due to explosions, as well as the possibility of identifying and punishing the sender. Ground-launched net cannons are highly accurate.
One drawback is that drone deployed nets have a lengthy reload time. This means that if there are multiple drones or if the target is not caught on the first attempt, the threat remains.
Radar
Radar employs radio energy for the purpose of object detection. With the aid of radars, the direction and position of a drone can be accurately determined. The majority of radars transmit a radio signal and subsequently receive the echo. Nevertheless, they seldom detect small targets. Originally, radars were developed to track larger objects like passenger aircraft. However, military forces also utilize radars to locate smaller drones that may be present in the vicinity.
Advantages: Radars are capable of covering vast areas, providing precise location information, and detecting multiple targets simultaneously. Given the necessity for unwavering vigilance in defense operations, regardless of weather conditions, radars serve as an excellent solution, even in situations of reduced visibility like fog, darkness, and more.
Drawback: The majority of radars are unable to differentiate between diminutive drones and tiny airborne creatures like bats or birds. As a result, radars may not be entirely effective for military purposes, as they could overlook small-sized drones.
High Power Microwave (HPM)
High Power Microwave devices have the ability to cause interference with other electronic devices, including drones. The radio links that control a drone’s movements can be disrupted by the HPM’s electromagnetic waves. In some cases, the HPM’s high voltage and currents can even lead to the destruction of the drone. This can be useful in situations where a suspicious drone needs to be neutralized to prevent potential harm.
Advantages: Efficient in halting drones that fall within the HPM radius.
Despite its ability to safeguard military bases and highly secure areas, this technology poses a potential threat to other electronic devices, inadvertently causing their destruction. Moreover, HPM has the capability to interfere with communication signals.
GPS Spoofer
Due to the utilization of this advanced technology, a signal is transmitted to the identified suspicious drone, effectively deceiving it regarding its actual location. By constantly updating the GPS coordinates, the spoofer gains control over the drone, allowing for its relocation to a designated “safe zone.” Consequently, the potential risks associated with the drone’s presence are significantly minimized.
Advantages: GPS spoofers are highly cost-effective technologies, enabling armies to acquire them in larger quantities and deploy them in diverse locations.
Drawback: Regrettably, there is a potential for interfering with other radio communication signals.
The system operator’s threat analysis suggests that electronic measures, specifically soft-kill techniques like frequency drone jamming, can effectively counter the UAV threat.
The gps jamming involves the focused transmission of RF power towards the specific frequency channels utilized by the Drone for telemetric, control, and navigation purposes. The actual range of the jamming signal, which relies on factors such as line of sight and power output, can extend up to approximately 5Km or even further distances when employing high power output (>50W).
